M & D Auto Body v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BYER, Judge.
On July 12, 1977, John Pallott, an automobile mechanic for M & D Auto Body, sustained a work-related injury. He received benefits for total disability.
M & D filed a petition for modification, alleging that Pallott’s condition had changed from full to partial disability effective June 17, 1978, when he opened an auto repair and inspection station. Pallott admitted continuously oper*348ating his inspection station, but denied that his condition had changed from full disability to partial disability because: (1) his business suffered a loss each year except in 1979;1 and (2) he was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- McCloskey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Cudo v. Hallstead Foundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bissland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Pennsylvania State Police v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Cipcic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Tindal v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Suprock v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.