Cudo v. Hallstead Foundry, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LARSEN *, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether after discovered evidence, as that term is used by the courts when considering a motion for a new trial, is the only basis upon which the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) may grant a rehearing.
Lewis Cudo (decedent) was an employee of Hallstead Foundry, Inc. (employer) for 22 years. For the five years preceding his death, decedent worked as a grinder, which position involved standing in a booth, grinding and turning metal castings weighing between 25 and 150 pounds. On May 17, 1979, decedent performed his normal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Hagopian v. EskandarianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Kocher v. KocherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Greeby v. Phila. Asbestos Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Lieberman v. Sunray Drug Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Westmoreland County v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Keith v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Wisniewski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.