Legal Opinion

S. O. S. Co. v. Triangle Manufacturing Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 17, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 54C959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, District Judge.

This case came on to be heard before the Court on the pleadings and the evidence consisting of oral testimony, documentary proofs, and physical exhibits. Witnesses were called in open court by the parties, and some portions of the testimony have been in the form of depositions. The Court has had the benefit of briefs of counsel and of oral arguments. The Court has reviewed the record and the briefs of counsel, weighed carefully the arguments presented, and considered the authorities advanced by counsel in support of their respective positions.

Upon a consideration of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Smith v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  3. Collar Co. v. Van DusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Associated Plastics Companies, Inc. v. Gits Molding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  5. Dixie-Vortex Co. v. Paper Container Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. v. Norton Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
  2. Johnson & Johnson v. Kendall Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
  3. La Maur, Inc. v. DeMert & Dougherty, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
  4. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v. Norton Company, Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Hadco Corporation,defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API