Legal Opinion
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v. Norton Company, Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Hadco Corporation,defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1970No. 18596, 18597PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.
On this appeal Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company asks reversal of a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, holding invalid Minnesota’s U.S. Patent No. 2,958,593. Minnesota had sued Norton Company, Studebaker-Paekard Corporation, and Hadco Corporation for damages for alleged infringement of the said patent, identified as the Hoover Patent. Defendants filed a cross-appeal from the District Court’s failure to award attorney fees as permitted by Title 35 U.S.C. § 285. 1
The adversaries will be identified as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Uniflow Manufacturing Co. And Jefferson Ice Company v. King-Seeley Thermos Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- General Motors Corp. v. Toyota Motor Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979
- Taussig v. Jack & Jill One Hour Cleaners, No. 12, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978