Legal Opinion
Johnson & Johnson v. Kendall Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 4, 1963No. 55 C 336PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBSON, District Judge.
By its complaint, filed March 1, 1955,. plaintiff, assignee-owner of Patent No. 2,703,083, issued the same day, in application filed January 4, 1955,1 to William J. Gross, for an “Adhesive Bandage,” 2' charges infringement by defendant. A counterclaim seeks a declaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 are here' involved.3
*125In a suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the same patent in a suit involving Claims 1-3, 9, 11 and 12 was held valid and infringed. (Johnson & Johnson v. C. B.…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re James A. Smith and James H. McLaughlin and Sterling Drug, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Dart Industries, Inc. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Johnson & Johnson v. The Kendall CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- E. C. Ernst International Corp. v. Andary (In Re E. C. Ernst, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- In Re James A. Smith and James H. McLaughlin and Sterling Drug, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983