Legal Opinion

Kuntz v. Kuntz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1999No. 980286PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Nephews sued their uncle to compel specific performance of an oral agreement for sale of the uncle’s farmland and other farm assets. After the uncle died, the trial court ruled for the nephews. The personal representative of the uncle’s estate appealed. We affirm, concluding the trial court did not err when it held the oral agreement was valid, specifically enforceable, and not the result of undue influence.

I

[¶ 2] Brothers George and Bert Kuntz farmed and ranched near Towner. They separately owned land and cattle, but owned machinery together, and operated together,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lire, Inc. v. Bob's Pizza Inn Restaurants, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Roise v. KurtzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Botnen v. LukensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Perry v. ReinkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stout v. Fisher Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lonesome Dove Petroleum, Inc. v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Fladeland v. GudbransonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re Estate of ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Smestad v. HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API