Legal Opinion
Roise v. Kurtz
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1998No. Civil 980102PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Greg Kurtz appealed from a judgment awarding damages to Cyndi Roise for injuries she suffered when Kurtz assaulted her. We affirm.
[¶ 2] On April 3, 1996, during a domestic dispute, Kurtz grabbed Roise by the arms and pushed her to the ground. As a result, Roise suffered injuries to her shoulder and neck. She was treated by several medical doctors and a chiropractor.
[¶ 3] Roise sued Kurtz, and the case was tried to the court. The court found Kurtz had assaulted Roise and awarded her $188,-154 in damages. The court also allowed prejudgment interest on that amount, result*574ing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Ruff v. WeintraubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Vasichek v. ThorsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Stee v. "L" Monte Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. SolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Gonzalez v. TounjianNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Kaler v. KraemerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Molitor v. MolitorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.