Legal Opinion

Botnen v. Lukens

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1998No. Civil 980109, 980128PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Kathryn Lukens, Fred Lukens, and Jane Lukens appealed an amended judgment in Nathan Botnen’s action to determine custody of Hunter James Botnen Lukens. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Fred Luk-ens’s and Jane Lukens’s motion for custody. We reverse the trial court’s custody award and remand for redetermination.

[¶2] Nathan Botnen and Kathryn Lukens are the unmarried biological parents of Hunter James Botnen Lukens, who was born on August 20, 1997. When Kathryn Lukens left North Dakota in September 1997 to begin her studies at the University of Georgia on a track…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hust v. HustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Anderson v. A.P.I. Co. of MinnesotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Williston Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Steiger Tractor, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Weber v. WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. McDermott v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Greenwood v. GreenwoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cox v. CoxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Goff v. GoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. OsierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API