Legal Opinion

People v. Manuel L.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1994No. S030597PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PANELLI, J.

Penal Code section 26 articulates a presumption that a minor under the age of 14 is incapable of committing a crime. (Pen. Code, §26, subd. One.)1 To defeat, the presumption, the People must show by “clear proof” that at the time the minor committed the charged act, he or she *232knew of its wrongfulness. This provision applies to proceedings under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602.2 (In re Gladys R., supra, 1 Cal.3d at p. 867.) Only those minors over the age of 14, who may be presumed to understand the wrongfulness of their acts, and those under 14 who—as demonstrated…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. Eddie M.California Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Peatros v. BANK OF AMERICA NT & SACalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. CottoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Wolfe v. Dublin Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API