People v. Manuel L.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PANELLI, J.
Penal Code section 26 articulates a presumption that a minor under the age of 14 is incapable of committing a crime. (Pen. Code, §26, subd. One.)1 To defeat, the presumption, the People must show by “clear proof” that at the time the minor committed the charged act, he or she *232knew of its wrongfulness. This provision applies to proceedings under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602.2 (In re Gladys R., supra, 1 Cal.3d at p. 867.) Only those minors over the age of 14, who may be presumed to understand the wrongfulness of their acts, and those under 14 who—as demonstrated…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. Eddie M.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Peatros v. BANK OF AMERICA NT & SACalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. CottoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Wolfe v. Dublin Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.