Legal Opinion

People v. Cottone

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2013No. S194107PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Under Evidence Code section 1108, 1 in the trial of sexual offense charges, evidence the defendant committed another sexual offense may be admissible to prove that the defendant has a propensity to engage in such conduct. This case raises two questions.

First, if the proffered conduct occurred before the defendant had reached the age of 14, must the prosecution establish that the defendant knew the conduct was wrongful and was thus capable of committing a crime, as required by Penal Code section 26, paragraph One (Penal Code section 26(One))? We conclude such proof is…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. McCurdyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. People v. JandresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. R.V.California Supreme Court · 2015

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API