Legal Opinion
Mickey Grayson v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 28, 2003No. 01-2001PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, Mickey Grayson, appeals from a summary judgment entered against him on his claims against the City of Chicago arising from alleged employment dis crimination. He claims race and age discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). The District Court held that Grayson did not establish a prima facie case of discrimination and entered a judgment for the defendant on March 20, 2001. Agreeing that Grayson has not established a prima facie case of discrimination, we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Loretta Cheek v. Western and Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Ernest L. Crady v. Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Indiana, Steve Richards, Branch Administrator, and Jack Ragland, Chief Executive OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Forkkio, Samuel E. v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Young in HONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHILDREN’S MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Baloch v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Patricia Rogers v. City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Fischer v. Avanade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Brenda Dandy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Atanus v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.