Legal Opinion
Ernest L. Crady v. Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Indiana, Steve Richards, Branch Administrator, and Jack Ragland, Chief Executive Officer
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 10, 1993No. 19-2156PublishedCited by 606 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Chief Judge.
Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Indiana and Ernest Crady dispute the reasons for Crady’s discharge from Liberty. Crady sued Liberty pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34 (“ADEA”). Liberty says Crady abandoned his job, forcing Liberty to discharge him. The district court granted Liberty’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
I
We review a grant of summary judgment in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party; here, Ernest Crady. Liberty hired Crady in May 1987 when Crady was 53 years old. Crady asserts that he was hired…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Robert R. Henn v. National Geographic SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by606 opinions
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kassner v. 2nd Avenue Delicatessen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Terry v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care CentreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Cynthia A. Richardson v. New York State Department of Correctional Service, Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
601 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.