Legal Opinion

In re Mounnarat

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 20, 2002, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

After he was laid off from his employment with an optical company, claimant received unemployment insurance benefits from November 5, 2001 until March 3, 2002. He thereafter accepted a position with Jamko Technical Solutions. When it was discovered that claimant had performed services for Jamko during the period that he was receiving benefits, the Department of Labor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PetrilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of EarlyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of SuriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of SuwczinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re the Claim of AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API