Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Roberts
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 27, 2008PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision finding that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not totally unemployed during the weeks in question. Claimant acknowledged that he provided services for Wurtsboro Flight Services on the relevant days and, hence, his own testimony supports the Board’s decision (see Matter of Suwczinsky [Commissioner of Labor], 10 AD3d 762 [2004]). We also discern no basis upon which to disturb the Board’s finding that claimant made willful misrepresentations in certifying for benefits and, thus, is liable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re BowlbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re MounnaratAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of BotheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of SuwczinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of BalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Corso (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re the Claim of GullottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of GullottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.