Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Suwczinsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 16, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 27, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

Because substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision, we affirm. Claimant admitted that she held an undisclosed part-time sales position in a jewelry store while she was receiving unemployment insurance benefits and, therefore, her own testimony establishes that she was not totally unemployed within the meaning of the Labor Law (see…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Claim of DeCarloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re MounnaratAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API