State v. Ayscue
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The defendant, being without counsel in the trial below, seeks to challenge in this Court for the first time (1) the admissibility of portions of the evidence adduced against him, and (2) the sufficiency of the evidence to carry the case to the jury. However, the record discloses no objection to any of the evidence nor motion for judgment as of nonsuit. In fact, nowhere in the record is there an objection or exception to any ruling of the trial court. The objections, first made in this Court, come too late. Decision here is controlled by what is said in S. v. Howell, 239 N.C. 78,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. GastonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. BeamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. WomackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.