Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1953No. 579PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Tbe defendant’s assignments of error Nos. 2, 3, and 4, based on bis exceptions Nos. 6 to 13, both inclusive, relate to tbe rulings of tbe court in excluding tbe testimony of Jerry Halton, and in permitting bim to be asked only one question, when recalled in rebuttal. Tbe defendant did not obfeet to tbe rulings of tbe court at the time, but entered exceptions to these rulings after tbe trial when be prepared bis statement of tbe case on appeal. Tbe defendant vigorously contends in ten pages of bis brief tbat these rulings of tbe court constitute reversible error; tbat “no exceptions were…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. . BensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. State v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868
  3. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Lowe v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. State v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. WinfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. LowerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. MangumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. State v. CrispSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API