Legal Opinion
Luster v. Bank of Chelsea
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 2, 1986No. 60819PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The dispositive issue on certiorari in this quiet title suit is whether the County Treasurer’s Resale Tax Deed by which Bill and Edith Luster (plaintiffs/appellees or Lus-ters) take title to the real property in question is valid and passes title to them free and clear of all other claims and interests to said property, except certain rights-of-way and easements of certain defendants. We answer in the negative. The unpub lished Memorandum Opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division 2, is vacated. We affirm that part of the trial court’s judgment which finds The Bank of Chelsea…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Pointer v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hukill v. Oklahoma Native American Domestic Violence CoalitionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- HALL v. THE GEO GROUP, INCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Shamblin v. BeasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Red Rock Mental Health v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.