Legal Opinion

Shamblin v. Beasley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 28, 1999No. 88965PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

¶ 1 The three dispositive issues presented on certiorari are: (1) Does the evidentiary material in the record provide undisputed proof that the service of statutory pre-sale notice on the wife-owner by delivery to her husband satisfies the fundamental law’s due process standards? (2) Do the alleged irregularities in the publication notice invalidate the tax resale? and (3) Does the evidentiary material tendered by the lender at nisi prius raise a fact issue on the merits of the controversy which was not fit for disposition by summary process? We answer the first and the third…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. Hukill v. Oklahoma Native American Domestic Violence CoalitionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. Vance v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API