Legal Opinion

Tennant v. Buratti Montandon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1948No. 9743PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES,. Justice.

This is a real estate commission suit. Chester Buratti and Harry Montandon, the agents, are appellees and Roy I. Tennant and wife, the sellers, are appellants.

The only question presented concerns the sufficiency of the writing declared upon in view of Sec. 22 Art. 6573a, VACS, which, in part, provides:

“No action shall be brought in any court in this State for the recovery of any commission for the sale or purchase of real estate unless the promise or agreement upon which such' action shall be brought, or some memorandum thereof, shall be in writing and signed by the party to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hutchings v. SlemonsTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. NearenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
  3. East Texas Fire Insurance v. KempnerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. NearenTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Ferguson v. MansfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wisznia v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Buratti & Montandon v. TennantTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. City of San Antonio v. Guido Bros. Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Faulk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  5. Hooks v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API