Legal Opinion

Kraft v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1944No. L. A. 18798PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchatter, J.

This malpractice case presents the problem of proper application of the provisions of sections 379a and 379e of the Code of Civil Procedure, added to the code in 1927, relating to joinder of parties defendant, in the light of the provisions of section 427 of the same code, relating to joinder of causes of action. The latter section was enacted in 1872 and, except as hereinafter mentioned, has not been amended since 1915.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, have joined as defendants in one action Drs. Joseph Smith and E. C. Innis, physicians and surgeons, who, independently of each other, treated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Guilliams v. Hollywood HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Ramey v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Smith v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Sutterfield v. District Court in and for Arapahoe CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API