Mooney v. Drainage District No. 1
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.
This is a suit in equity for a mandatory injunction to prevent Drainage District No. 1 of Richardson county and the supervisors thereof, defendants, from dissolving the drainage district before they comply with an affirmed *193judgment of the district court for Richardson county, requiring them to enlarge the outlet of their drainage system between Burlington railroad bridge 64 ahd the- Missouri river to the minimum carrying capacity of 20,000 cubic feet of water a second. James P. Mooney and others similarly situated, plaintiffs, are owners of lands which were assessed by the district for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hodges v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Ettor v. City of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mooney v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Tukey v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Karrer v. KarrerNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- Bond Bros. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.