Batishchev v. Cote
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Fremont-Smith, Thayer, J.
In this case, plaintiffs assert that they were fraudulently induced to purchase a condominium unit which was represented to be the right-hand unit in the building and to be free of significant water infiltration, whereas they were actually sold the left-hand unit which they did not want and which had a significant water infiltration problem.
After a trial on liability, the jury found that the erroneous sale resulted from the negligence of plaintiffs’ attorney, Natasha Amitan (“Amitan”),1 and from the intentional misrepresentations of the seller’s attorney, Sabrina Lanz…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Lowell Gas Co. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Batishchev v. CoteMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
- Batishchev v. CoteMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008