Legal Opinion

Batishchev v. Cote

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 24, 2007No. 054074EPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fremont-Smith, Thayer, J.

Before trial, the Cote defendants made an offer of judgment for $3,000 and then for $5,000 which plaintiff declined. As the juiy found them to have made intentional misrepresentations to the plaintiffs, but found that the plaintiffs did not reasonably rely thereon, no tort liability was established. The Court, however, found that the Cote defendants had violated c. 93A and awarded nominal damages of $25 and ruled that they should be jointly liable with Sabrina Lanz and her law firm, Fee, Rosse & Lanz, P.C. (“the Lanz defendants”) for double the amount of plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Raymer v. Bay State National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Columbia Chiropractic Group, Inc. v. Trust InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Baghdady v. Lubin & Meyer, P.C.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Batishchev v. CoteMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API