Legal Opinion

Batishchev v. Cote

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided February 25, 2008No. 050407EPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fremont-Smith, Thayer, J.

The following orders on the pending post-trial motions and the order for judgment are the end result of a preposterous fraud committed on the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs, who are Russian-born scientists, were shown a condominium on the right-hand side of the building, which the broker described to them as Unit A. When they asked for a floor plan, the broker (defendant Cote) provided them a floor plan which likewise showed Unit A on the right side. Later, the building owner’s1 manager confirmed the plan, which had been intentionally altered. Plaintiffs were also assured…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Batishchev v. CoteMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
  4. Batishchev v. CoteMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Batishchev v. CoteMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API