Legal Opinion

Apex Control Systems, Inc. v. Alaska Mechanical, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1989No. S-2636, S-2658PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

Alaska Mechanical, Inc. (“AMI”) is a mechanical contractor engaged in the business of furnishing and installing plumbing, heating and air conditioning systems. Apex Control Systems, Inc. (“Apex”), a mechanical controls contractor, designs, furnishes and installs the devices which regulate heating and air conditioning systems. It is customary for mechanical contractors to subcontract the controls work to controls contractors.

This case arises from two unrelated subcontracts between AMI and Apex: the Adak contract and the Pump Station No. 3 contract.

During the performance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adoption of v. M. C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Chicago College Of Osteopathic Medicine v. George A. Fuller CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. JacobAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Shepherd v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pavone v. PavoneAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Nicdao v. Chase Home FinanceDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API