Legal Opinion
Pavone v. Pavone
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1993No. S-5114PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
Leonard Pavone brought this action to recover a commercial fishing limited entry permit which he had earlier transferred to his son, Anthony Pavone. The superior court refused to order the return of the permit because of the illegality, under AS 16.43.150(g)(2), of Leonard’s oral retransfer agreement with his son. We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In 1975, Leonard Pavone applied for a Bristol Bay limited entry permit. AS 16.-43.140. The Alaska Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission (“CFEC”) rejected his application. To continue fishing, Leonard purchased a permit from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oaksmith v. BrusichAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. TempletonAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Jackson Purchase Rural Electric Cooperative Association v. Local Union 816, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Kaps Transport, Inc. v. HenryAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Cosmopolitan Financial Corp. v. RunnelsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Tenala, Ltd. v. FowlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Leisnoi, Inc. v. Merdes & Merdes, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Schultz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
- State, Division of Workers' Compensation v. Titan Enterprises, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.