Legal Opinion
Nicdao v. Chase Home Finance
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 13, 2012No. Case No. 3:10-cv-00192-TMBPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIMOTHY M. BURGESS, District Judge.
This is an action by Plaintiff Maria Elena G. Nicdao, proceeding pro se, against Defendant Chase Home Finance (“Chase”) for “wrongful foreclosure, improper legal paper work and improper loan modification/forbearance implementation.”1 Chase has moved for judgment on the pleadings.2 Plaintiff opposes the motion.3 For the reasons discussed below, Chase’s motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
Plaintiff filed this action on August 27, 2010.4 In an initial order directing Plaintiff to serve her original Complaint, the Court asserted that…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Brooks Range Petroleum Corporation v. ShearerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Abbott v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020
- Bank of America, N.A. v. BlasDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2025
- Coleman v. Alaska USA Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.