Thompson v. Independent School District No. 94 of Garfield County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
In this case Plaintiff timely appealed from the judgment on the verdict, but was a day late in an attempt to appeal from the post-judgment order awarding attorney’s fees. We must limit the issues on appeal to a challenge of the judgment on the verdict itself, and the correctness of the post-judgment order awarding attorney’s fees is not before us at this time.
A jury verdict for Defendants was filed on April 16, 1993 and the Journal Entry of Judgment was filed on May 11, 1993. Plaintiff filed a petition in error in this Court on Monday, May 17, 1993. His appeal is a timely…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rout v. Crescent Public Works AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Anco Mfg. & Supply Company, Inc. v. SwankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- MATTER OF ESTATE OF BURKHART v. WabaunseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Matter of K.L.F.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Cunningham v. Public Service Co. OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Patterson v. BeallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Harkrider v. PoseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- GRP of Texas, Inc. v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.