Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Public Service Co. Oklahoma
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 14, 1992No. 72123PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMA WILSON, Justice.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to entertain the post-appeal motion for attorney fees, filed before mandate, where the trial court denial of a motion for attorney fees by the party was raised on appeal but not settled by the appellate opinion. We hold that in the unusual posture, narrowly delimited by the proceedings in this case, the trial court had jurisdiction over the *975post-decisional motion for attorney fees for trial related legal services.
Roger and Gloria Cunningham, plaintiffs/appellees, (Cunninghams) sued Public…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Willis v. Nowata Land and Cattle Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Cartwright v. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- National Educators Life Insurance Co. v. Apache Lanes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Hamilton v. Telex Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- GRP of Texas, Inc. v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Thompson v. Independent School District No. 94 of Garfield CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Reynolds v. KindredCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Bilby v. Claremore Ambulance Rescue & Emergency Services, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Cunningham v. Public Service Co. OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.