Legal Opinion
Tennison v. City & County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 23, 2005No. C-04-0574 CW (EMC)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HENDRIX’S MOTION TO COMPEL; GRANTING DEFENDANT SANDERS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT SANDERS’ MOTION TO COMPEL (Docket Nos. 76, 77, 80)
CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff John Tennison filed suit against various defendants, including the City and County of San Francisco (“City”), the San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”), two police inspectors (in their official and individual capacities), and an ADA (George Butter-worth), alleging that Defendants violated his civil rights during the criminal…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment DealerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Patrick v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- McCarthy v. Slade Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- United States v. All Assets Held At Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Truman v. City of OremDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.