United States v. All Assets Held At Bank Julius Baer & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
G. MICHAEL HARVEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On March 26, 2015, this case was referred to the undersigned for purposes of management of discovery and resolution of any discovery-related disputes. Currently ripe for resolution by the undersigned is Claimant Pavel Lazarenko’s Second Motion to Compel. After a thorough review of the parties’ briefs concerning Claimant’s motion, of the arguments of counsel at hearing on the motion on August 11, 2015, and of the entire record herein, the Court will deny the motion.1
BACKGROUND
The factual background concerning this…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Federal Election Commission v. RiveraDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- Mischler v. Novagraaf Group BvDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Slaughter v. WilkieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Subasic v. State of OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022