Vollmer v. Akerson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Plaintiff brought an action to recover money his employer withheld from his final paycheck. The money was withheld to pay the costs of purchasing tail insurance coverage. The parties dispute whether the employment contract required a former employee to purchase tail insurance coverage at the expiration of his employment contract. 1 The trial court granted Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and awarded him the amount withheld. Employer appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Siouxland Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Associates (Associates) entered into a one year employment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Pesicka v. PesickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- North River Insurance Co. v. Golden Rule Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Delzer Construction Co. v. South Dakota State Board of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Citibank (S.D.), N.A. v. HauffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gail M. Benson Living Trust v. Physicians Office Building, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Laska v. BarrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Clarkson & Co. v. Continental Resources, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Atmosphere Hospitality Management, LLC v. Shiba Investments, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2016
- Equipment Service Professionals v. DenowhSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.