Legal Opinion

Citibank (S.D.), N.A. v. Hauff

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] While Tonette Hauff and David Hauff were married, Tonette applied for and received a Citibank credit card account. Although it was Tonette’s account, she authorized David to obtain a card and become an authorized user of her account. In preparation for their subsequent divorce, Tonette and David paid off the account. After the divorce, the credit cards expired, Tonette left the marital home, but Citibank sent renewal cards to Tonette at that home. Without telling Tonette, David fraudulently took possession of the new cards, he activated them through a telephone call…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Tibke v. McDougallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Nelson v. WEB Water Development Ass'n, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Oscar S. Gray v. American Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Ruane v. MurraySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals & Health SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Harvieux v. Progressive N. Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. A-G-E Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Fix v. First State Bank of RoscoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API