Legal Opinion
Pesicka v. Pesicka
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSabers, Justice
[¶ 1.] The Judgment and Decree of Divorce incorporated a Stipulation and Agreement providing for the division of Gary’s teacher retirement benefit. The circuit court held that the provision was a clear and unambiguous statement of the amount Betty was to receive and refused to set aside the provision or award interest pursuant to SDCL 15 — 6—60(b)(6). Betty appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Gary and Betty were divorced on October 1, 1985 after twenty-eight years of marriage. Both parties were represented by counsel in the divorce proceedings. Counsel for Betty drafted the provision on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Alverson v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Hayes v. Northern Hills General HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Hrachovec v. KaarupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Ziegler Furniture & Funeral Home, Inc. v. CicmanecSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Block v. DrakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Hill v. HillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Dowling Family Partnership v. Midland Farms, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.