Legal Opinion
Wayne v. Village of Sebring
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 29, 1994No. Nos. 93-3354, 93-3384PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs are 18 residents of Smith Township, Mahoning County, Ohio, who reside within the service area of the Sebring Village Waterworks System. They brought this civil rights action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, against, inter alia, the Village of Sebring and its council members and manager. Plaintiffs challenge Sebring’s recently enacted ordinances providing that the village will supply water and sewer service to those outside the village limits only upon the landowners’ annexation of the land to Sebring. Pursuant to a motion for summary…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Officer Melissa Kallstrom v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Sensations, Inc. v. City of Grand RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Chris R. Plott v. General Motors Corporation, Packard Electric DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Miami University Ohio State University, the Chronicle of Higher Education, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.