Legal Opinion

Downey v. Downey

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 4, 1984No. (2379)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

The named defendant appeals from the trial court’s judgment determining that a group insurance policy contained a facility of payment clause which created a duty in the defendant beneficiary to pay a portion of the death benefits received by her to the plaintiff. The court held that the failure of that defendant to make such payments to the plaintiff gave rise to the imposition of a constructive trust in favor of the plaintiff. The named defendant claims on appeal 1 that there was no such facility of payment clause in the policy and that the requirements for imposing a constructive trust had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Downs v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  2. Zack v. GuzauskasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Pepin v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Worobey v. SibiethSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Bridge-Mile Shoe Corporation v. Liggett Drug Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gulack v. GulackConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Filosi v. HawkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. DeWitt v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. Maltas v. MaltasDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  5. Faria v. Rego, No. Cv00-0162954 (Apr. 30, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API