Legal Opinion

Zack v. Guzauskas

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 25, 1976PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.

The plaintiffs in this action ask that a trust for their benefit be imposed upon real property owned of record by the defendant, basing their claims on theories of resulting and constructive trust. The trial court concluded that the defendant is the sole legal and equitable owner of the property which is the subject of this dispute, and rendered judgment in favor of the defendant. The plaintiffs have appealed to this court from that judgment. Many of the plaintiffs’ assignments of error relating to correction of the court’s finding have not been briefed and are therefore considered to have…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Cecio Bros., Inc. v. FeldmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Russell v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Williams v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API