Legal Opinion
Bridge-Mile Shoe Corporation v. Liggett Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 3, 1955PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wyítíte, J.
In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for the expense of extensive alterations made to a building sublet to it by the defendant, and for loss of business incident to the alterations. The trial court rendered judgment for the defendant, and from that judgment this appeal has been taken.
The court’s finding has been attacked in numerous particulars. The facts which are not in dispute are as follows: On July 25, 1950, the parties entered into a written indenture of lease by which the defendant sublet to the plaintiff, for a term beginning September 15, 1950, and ending…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chouinard v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Gayne v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Bronx Derrick & Tool Co. v. Porcupine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Haddad v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Judd v. Mutual Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Downs v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc. v. Town of LisbonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Franchey v. HannesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.