Legal Opinion
Hufford v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 30, 2009No. 08-257CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SMITH, Senior Judge.
Defendant has filed a Motion for Summary Dismissal pursuant to Court of Federal Claims Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth in this Opinion, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s Motion.
FACTS
The facts of this case are difficult to discern from Plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiffs complaint appears to allege that President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney and Halliburton Oil Service Company have conspired to disrupt the flow of petroleum from the Middle East. It appears that Ms. Hufford alleges that the conspiracy artificially…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hufford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Phang v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Reid v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Silver Buckle Mines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Cycenas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.