Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sharon Raulerson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 14, 2013No. 10-193LPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rails-to-trails class action; approval of settlement and attorney’s fees.

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Proposed Settlement, filed November 27, 2012, and Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Court Approval of Fees and Pi’oposed Division of the Common Fund, filed November 28, 2012. The Court preliminarily approved the settlement on December 6, 2012 and held a Fairness Hearing on the settlement and plaintiffs’ fee motion on January 17, 2013. The Court now finds that the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate under RCFC 23(e)(2), and that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Berkley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Sabo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. National Treasury Employees Union v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Raulerson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Haggart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Greenwood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API