Legal Opinion
Lujan v. Minagar
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 2004No. B170438PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, J.
State Labor Commissioner Arthur S. Lujan appeals from the judgment dismissing his action against Shala Minagar for retaliatory job termination under the state’s Occupational Safety and Health Act. (Lab. Code, § 6310.) For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand with directions to enter a new and different judgment in favor of the Labor Commissioner, including a determination of the amount of damages, if any.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Shala Minagar owns a beauty salon in Malibu. On September 7, 1999, Minagar’s shop was inspected and cited for several minor workplace…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cristler v. Express Messenger Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Alexander v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Honig v. San Francisco Planning DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Rope v. Auto-Chlor System of Washington, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Creighton v. City of LivingstonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.