Legal Opinion
Aimcor v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 17, 1999No. Slip Op. 99-37; Court 96-12-02868PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion For Judgment Upon The Agency Record (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”). Plaintiffs challenge the decision of the International Trade Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the Department”) not to apply its methodology for hyperinflationary economies or otherwise adjust the direct cost-of-materials reported by Defendants Intervenor, Companhia de Ferro Ligas da Bahia (“Ferbasa”), to account for hyperinflation. For the reasons below, the Court finds Commerce’s decision not to be supported by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- JBF RAK LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Jinxiang Yuanxin Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Prodotti Alimentari Meridionali, S.R.L. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.