Legal Opinion
Nucor Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 19, 2004No. Consol. Court 02-00612PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Judge: In this consolidated action, Plaintiffs have filed two Rule 56.2 Motions for Judgment on the Agency Record: the first filed by Nucor Corporation (“Nucor”); the second filed jointly by Bethlehem Steel Corporation, National Steel Corporation, and United States Steel Corporation (collectively “Domestic Integrated Producers”). Plaintiffs challenge two final negative material injury determinations of the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”): 1) Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products from Australia, India, Japan, Sweden, and Thailand, Invs. Nos. 731-TA-965,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Nsk Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- JMC Steel Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Nitrogen Solutions Fair Trade Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.