Legal Opinion
Breaux v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 1990No. H001548PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.
Giles Breaux and several other individuals, agricultural employees within the meaning of California’s Agricultural Labor Relations Act (the Act) (Lab. Code, § 1140 et seq.), were required as a condition of their employment to be members of the United Farm Workers of America, AFL-CIO (the UFW). They filed unfair labor practice charges (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, §§ 20201-20208; cf. Lab. Code, § 1160.2) against the UFW, alleging among other things that certain moneys they were required to pay to the UFW were being used, over their objections, for political activities…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ebensteiner Co., Inc. v. Chadmar GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Ebensteiner Co. v. Chadmar GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Zubarau v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011