Legal Opinion
Parker v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided May 13, 1997No. 2124952PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELDER, Judge.
Michael A.S. Parker (appellant) appeals his conviction of stalking in violation of Code § 18.2-60.3. Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. In the alternative, he contends that the stalking statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
FACTS
Appellant was convicted of first offense stalking in violation of Code § 18.2-60.3. The evidence at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, was that appellant and the victim had been involved in a relationship since 1989 that was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Alfred Banks, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
- Galloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Smith v. MartensSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.