Legal Opinion

Smith v. Martens

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 18, 2005No. 91,827PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

Becky Smith filed an action under the civil Protection from Stalking Act (Act), K.S.A. 2003 Supp. 60-31a01 et seq., seeking a protective order against her former husband, Phil Martens. The district court ruled that the Act was constitutional, issued a 1-year protection from stalking order (PSO), and awarded Smith $5,000 in attorney fees. Martens appeals, raising numerous issues.

The PSO issued by the district court expired on November 24, 2004, rendering all issues raised in this appeal moot. Before the case was argued by the parties on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. People v. BaerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. DuffySupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. SebeliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Korytkowski v. City of OttawaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Putman v. KennedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. State v. RoatSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  5. Williams v. LawtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API