Legal Opinion

American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Barnes Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 13, 1939No. 982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, District Judge.

This suit is in equity. The bill of complaint, in substance, alleges that under a written contract entered into in February, 1933, defendant The Barnes Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Barnes Company), became the agent of complainant to sell fertilizers on commission; that the contract provided that the fertilizers consigned thereunder, as well as the cash, notes and accounts resulting from sales thereof, should at all times remain complainant’s property and should be kept separate and apart from other monies and promptly remitted to complainant; that, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. NichollsSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Ex Parte HernlenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Thompson v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  4. Patapsco Guano Co. v. Bryan & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. The Texas Co. v. C.W. Brewer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. United States v. Leo LutzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. Morgan v. Eaton's Dude RanchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Schenley Distillers Corporation v. RenkenDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1940
  5. Cafritz v. Corporation Audit Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API