Legal Opinion

United States v. Leo Lutz

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1961No. 18495PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge.

The United States, plaintiff-appellant, seeks recovery from Leo Lutz, defendant, for debts owed by two corporations the defendant owned and managed. Lutz was the president, a director and, except for qualifying shares held by other directors, the sole shareholder of both corporations.

In October 1952 the Army contracted to purchase $35,897 worth of canned tomatoes from two Indiana food processing corporations, Lutz Canning Co. ($27,168) and Delphi Canning Co. ($8,729). Although the Army made immediate payment, the tomatoes were not to be de livered until March 1953. The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Louis Lobato v. Pay Less Drug Stores, Inc., a Corporation Abe B. Cohen, James L. Grady, Charles Finke, and Burt RosenburgCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  5. California Insurance v. Union Compress Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Oscar RendaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. Lakeshore Apartments, Inc. v. United States of America, Elazar Behar Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Leigh v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  5. United States v. A. D. CrockerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API