Legal Opinion

Graf v. Sumpter

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 4, 1962No. Civ. 20021PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

Although judgment after trial without a jury was in their favor, plaintiffs appeal because they think the findings require a greater award than was granted.

Defendant and his joint venture associate, now deceased, sold to plaintiffs a lot and a house to be constructed thereon. Purchase price was $19,500. Contrary to the seller’s representations, the house was built on filled land which was not properly compacted. The house settled unduly. It was necessary to place concrete pilings under the house to stabilize it, and to repair cracking and crumbling of the structure, all at a cost of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Garrett v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Garstang v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Carter v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Central Mutual Insurance v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pepper v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Strebel v. Brenlar Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. McCue v. Bruce Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API